Showing posts with label insensitive advertising. Show all posts
Showing posts with label insensitive advertising. Show all posts

9926: Hitler Hawks Haircare.


From The New York Post…

Turkish shampoo ad featuring Hitler sparks outrage

By AFP/NEWSCORE

ANKARA, Turkey—A Turkish shampoo commercial featuring Adolf Hitler has drawn outrage from Jewish groups worldwide and calls for it to be withdrawn immediately.

“It’s totally unacceptable to make use of Hitler, the most striking example of cruelty and savagery,” the Turkish Jewish Community said in a statement, blasting the 12-second ad that has been airing since last week.

The commercial for Biomen, a men’s shampoo, shows a gesticulating Hitler delivering an enthusiastic speech, urging male customers to buy the product that is “a 100 percent male shampoo.”

“If you are not wearing a woman’s dress, you should not use her shampoo either,” he says.

Jewish organizations in Turkey have asked the advertising agency to pull the commercial.

On an international level, the United States-based Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which fights anti-semitism, said it was “repulsed.”

Using Hitler, “who was responsible for the mass murder of six million Jews and millions of others in the Holocaust to sell shampoo is a disgusting and deplorable marketing ploy,” said Abraham H. Foxman, the national director of the ADL and a Holocaust survivor, in a statement.

“It is an insult to the memory of those who perished in the Holocaust, those who survived, and those who fought to defeat the Nazis.”

9784: Draftfcbullshit.


The Adweek-Draftfcb-U.S. Census Bureau publishing partnership is more extensive than a Black History Month list of factoids. The New America is labeled as sponsored content—which is actually code for advertising. Or self-promotional pap.

There are already a dozen entries producing a growing pile of editorial excrement that can only be described as airheaded, arrogant and asinine.

Additional inane press releases include The Multiracial Native American and The End of the Segregated City? However, the original perspectives are particularly annoying.

Has Webster’s Redefined Urban? is the title of an essay allegedly authored by Draftfcb Global Chief Talent Officer Cindy Augustine. Criticizing Urban Outfitters for excluding Blacks from its catalogs, Augustine remarked, “We Black Americans do not see this as a marketing oversight. Marketers are savvy and they certainly know their stats so it’s either a deliberate signal that we and our trillions of dollars are not welcome (don’t want the ‘urban’ brand to become ‘Black’) or they hope that the word ‘urban’ is enough of a signal for us to come shop, but hope we’re blind to our own invisibility—the best of both worlds and a sweet ROI.” Wow, that’s a mouthful for someone who admitted having zero advertising agency experience when she took the job in 2011. Now she’s a spokeswoman for Black America. The budding thought leader should know that multicultural marketing professionals are cautious to position themselves as experts by essentially declaring, “I am; therefore, I know.”

Draftfcb EVP Group Management Director Jeff Tarakajian proclaimed, “I officially predict the fall of multicultural advertising and the rise of advertising that’s multicultural.” Can’t help but recognize the inherent ignorance and latent racism in the bold vision. The truth is, as the country becomes increasingly diverse, the exclusively White advertising historically produced by agencies like Draftfcb is what has really fallen. In short, traditional “general-market” messages are irrelevant and obsolete. So how do the White guys respond? By stealing the work usually handled by minority shops, whispering to the clients that segregated efforts are no longer necessary. What makes Tarakajian’s statement most outrageous is the fact that Draftfcb produces perhaps the greatest amount of offensive, culturally clueless campaigns in the industry. These morons have not earned the right to execute “advertising that’s multicultural”—they are woefully unqualified for the task.

If anything, it’s safe to predict the fall of Draftfcb, especially considering the recent and impending account losses. The agency remains proof positive that the mergers of past decades—coupled with the hubris of out-of-touch, outdated and financially obsessed leaders—have created a lumbering dinosaur representing everything that’s wrong on Madison Avenue today. The Agency of the Future is history, and it does not deserve to be part of The New America.

9644: China Times Means Racist Times.


China Times restaurant “Brings Out The Chinese In Anyone,” according to this campaign from DDB in Dubai, UAE. OK, but what does it do for Chinese patrons?



From Ads of the World.

9588: H&M Strikes Culturally Clueless Pose.


Retailer H&M managed to display cultural cluelessness with the admission that models’ heads were combined with mannequin bodies—and the fake figures were even colored to match the models’ skin tones. Commentary ensued at sources including Jezebel, Sociological Images and The Guardian; additionally, press coverage included ABC and FOX. While some might argue the multicultural images at least display diversity, the identical bodies—as well as the long hair—are clearly embracing Eurocentric beauty standards.

9587: Draftfcb Racism In Book of Tens Twice.


Advertising Age presented its annual Book of Tens, featuring two mentions of the NIVEA fiasco that managed to make the racist company look, well, racist. Of course, no references were made to culturally clueless advertising agency Draftfcb for concocting the racist shit.

The Top 10 Stories on AdAge.com in 2011
1. How Charlie Sheen Got His Twitter Account Verified So Fast
2. Super Bowl Ad Review: It Was Bieber Fever and Eminem Epidemic
3. Facebook Turns the ‘Like; Into Its Newest Ad
4. The Demographics of Social Media
5. Chrysler Splits With New Media Strategies Over F-Bomb Tweet
6. The 10 Best Ads to Come out of Steve Jobs’ Reign at Apple
7. Wieden & Kennedy Is Ad Age’s Agency of the Year
8.The Verdict Is in: Super Bowl’s Best-Liked and Most-Recalled Ads
9. Your Followers Are No Measure of Your Influence
10. Nivea Pulls Ad, Apologizes After Racism Accusations

Nivea’s Uncivilized Ad
The company’s campaign for a men’s line included photos of sharp-dressed guys chucking remnants of their former scraggly selves. The problem? Under the photo of a clean-shaven black man tossing what looked like a severed head with an Afro, ran the words “Re-civilize yourself.” After blog outrage, including a charge that Nivea was “unapologetically racist,” the company didn’t even attempt to defend the ad. It simply apologized and vowed never to run it again.